The Manager of the Retail Market Design Service and ESB Networks senior management are committed to the implementation and on-going operation and improvement of the Management System. The services, policies and objectives of RMDS as well as the resources required to achieve them are set out in the RMDS Business Plan. This plan has been agreed by ESB Networks Senior Management and submitted to the Commission for Energy Regulation who have approved it.
Pursuant to the plan:
At a minimum, six monthly reviews are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the Management System, track the achievement of objectives and ensure resources remain adequate.
Regular customer and stakeholder surveys, and subject to their availability, meetings are included in the RMDS business plan. The RMDS service objectives are based on the requirements established through these contacts. These are set out in the RMDS business plan agreed between the Manager of the Retail Market Design Service and senior management.
Our Processes to ensure customer satisfaction are mapped in ARIS which include processes for Customer Needs Assessment & Communications.
To ensure Customer Satisfaction
The RMDS Quality Policy is as follows:
The Retail Market Design Service provides an impartial, friendly and expert service and support to all market participants, active or prospective, in the electricity retail market design and its operation. We are committed to carry out our role to the highest standards of quality and professionalism.
We will play our part in 'making the market work'.
Our Customers
Our Processes
Our People
Our Mandate
5.4.1 Service objectives
The RMDS Service Objectives are set out on the next page.
Relevance to Our Customers and Services
These objectives are based on feedback from our customers and are aligned with our Quality Policy.
Senior Management Commitment
The RMDS Service Objectives are agreed with ESBN Senior Management, our customers and the Commission via the RMDS Business Plan.
Establishment of the Service Objectives
The Service Objectives have been briefed to our team and are measured by them. One service objective is dependant on the performance of a key service provider. We are in the process of agreeing a service level with this provider consistent with the overall requirement of the service objective.
Measurability of our Service Objectives
Progress against objectives is measured and reviewed at team meetings and the Management Review.
Service Objectives
| Area | Activity | Measure | Objective |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer | Surveys | No. per year | 1 |
| Process | Design releases | No. of significant errors | 0 |
| Information released to website | Time to release from receipt | < 1 day | |
| Change Control | Circulation of documents (days before meeting) | 5 | |
| Query Helpline | Response time to Design Queries | 5 | |
| Market Meetings | Agendas (days before meeting) | 5 | |
| Circulation of IGG Minutes (days after meeting) | 10 | ||
| Circulation of Conf. Call Minutes (days after meeting) | 5 | ||
| Open/Carried Forward Action Items list (days before meeting) | 1 | ||
| New Action Items List (days after meeting) | 2 | ||
| Resolution or escalation of IGG Actions (weeks) | 12 | ||
| Change Control | Circulation of documents (days before meeting) | 5 | |
| New Release of design documents (No. of significant errors) | 0 | ||
| System planned outages | Notice of part weekend outage (days) | 5 | |
| People | Training and Development | Personal development plan completion | 5 |
| CER | Mandate | Formal reviews | 10 |
| Financial | Financial Plan | Expenditure within overall budget | 100% |
Other Standards: We publish these standards as guidelines and work to keep to them.
| Area | Activity | Measure | Objective |
|---|---|---|---|
| Process | Design releases | No. of non-significant errors | < 5 |
| Response time to queries requiring input from 3rd parties (e.g. ESBN) | 10 | ||
| Market Meetings | Working documents (days before meeting) | 2 | |
| Presentations (days before meeting) | 2 | ||
| Final presentations (days after meeting) 2 | 2 | ||
| Change Control | New Release of design documents (no. of typographical errors) | < 5 |
5.4.2 Management system planning
The management system has been planned and implemented to meet our service objectives and the requirements of the ISO 9001 standard.
Performance against service objectives, audit results and non-conformances are discussed during Management Review at team meetings and dedicated meetings to assess the effectiveness of the Management System. Any required changes are agreed.
Changes to the RMDS Management System are subsequently audited and the performance and audit results are reviewed at Management Review to ensure that the Management System continues to be effective, see our Audit checklist.
5.5 Responsibility, authority and communication
5.5.1 Responsibility and authority
The organizational chart for RMDS is included in section 3 of this Quality Manual.
The responsibilities of each team member have been discussed, agreed and confirmed to all team members and our customers. (See our work plans documented in ARIS)
Each team member meets the Team Leader once a year to agree a Personal Development Plan (PDP), taking into account the needs of the service and the development needs of the team member as a professional. PDPs are reviewed at mid year and early in the third quarter.
All team members are responsible for following the policies outlined in this manual, as well as the detailed procedures outlined in ARIS diagrams. If the detailed procedures are unclear, or are no longer appropriate then the team member who identified the issue informs the Quality Manager, who will take the appropriate corrective action. If an activity is performed that does not agree with the documented procedures then this should be treated as a non conformance and handled appropriately.
Non conformances, corrective actions and preventive actions will be discussed at the fortnightly team meeting to ensure that all team members are aware of any issues arising. Where an issue arises which must be addressed before the next team meeting, then an ad hoc meeting will be called (with or without the Manager RMDS) or e-mail may be used to ensure that all team members are aware of the issue.
5.5.2 Management representative
The Quality Manger has been appointed by the Manager RMDS as management representative. As management representative, they have the following responsibility and authority:
Please see our Management Representative Responsibilities Documented in ARIS.
5.5.3 Internal communication
Our methods of communicating the effectiveness of the MS include Team Meetings, circulation of minutes of management review, Internal Audit meetings, and other routine business communication.
Effective Internal Organisational Communications
RMDS relies on having high degrees of communications. Effective internal communications start with effective skills in communications, including basic skills in listening, speaking, questioning and sharing feedback. Perhaps the most important outcome from these skills is conveying that you value hearing from others and their hearing from you. A key ingredient in developing effective communications in RMDS is by each person taking responsibility to assert when they don't understand a communication or to suggest when and how someone could communicate more effectively.
Policies to Support Effective Internal Communications
This communication can be looked at as communications downward and upward. Downward Communications:
Upward Communications:
5.6.1 General
Weekly checkpoint meetings and fortnightly team meetings/briefings are scheduled throughout the year. The Management System is a fixed topic on the agenda of these meetings. Performance against the service objectives and aspects of the Management System are reviewed at each meeting, including possible ways of improving it. Records are maintained for each management review meeting. Our Management Review Process is documented in ARIS which includes inputs documented for review and outputs such as Actions to improve our Management System & Service. See below
5.6.2 Review input
Assessment of the MS is based on a review of information inputs to management review. Over the course of the year, reviews include:
See below Inputs documented in ARIS
5.6.3 Review output
Opportunities for improvement of our processes and our services are reviewed. Any resource needs are identified. Decisions and Actions are agreed to address any issues or opportunities. The Decisions and Actions, together with responsibility for each action is agreed and recorded in the meeting minutes and also in SharePoint for follow-up.