Services:
RMDS provide a range of services all touching on the retail market design. The key services are:
Obligations: In addition, RMDS is charged with a number of other tasks:
Themes:
The concern for RMDS in 2009 is to continue to facilitate the major changes planned - including those to further enhance the retail market processes as an efficient, cost-effective means of conducting business.
RMDS will be increasing the quality and responsiveness of the service provided to MPs through all media.
Key Objectives:
Release and cutover:
Process improvement:
Design Information Service:
Operational updates:
New Entrant Service:
Retail Market Forums:
Market Assurance:
Issue resolution:
Messaging Service:
3.2 Management and Organisation
Organisation: The service is provided by personnel drawn from IT Consulting, from ESB's CIO organisation and externally. The team lead reports to the Manager RMDS, a manager within the Market Data Services division of ESB Networks.
Ringfencing:
Impartiality and transparency are vital in the role of Design Administrator. The Commission decision, required personnel, reporting and financial separation of RMDS from other parts of ESB and ESB Networks. These measures and others have been implemented:
The RMDS team aspire to the highest levels of transparency and are continuing to improve transparency throughout all our activities and those in the market in general. RMDS prides itself on its responsiveness and proactive assistance to market participants to ensure that all processes work as smoothly as possible and with minimum cost of participation.
Professional Support:
RMDS, at the request of the Commission, maintains a contract for professional services for the role of Assurance Body. The current contract is with Gemserv.
A key element of the services provided to market participants is the knowledge and expertise of its team members. Market participants depend on this resource when they have a query on the operation of the market design and to ensure that the optimal design is obtained in response to requests for change.
A major objective for RMDS is to maintain and develop the expertise of the team and to ensure that new joiners are quickly brought up to the necessary level.
The areas of expertise required to meet this standard include:
Among the skills required are:
The following measures are in place in order to achieve this objective:
RMDS costs are recouped via Distribution Use of System (DUoS) Charges and form part of the Distribution price review. From 2009 onwards, RMDS costs will be reviewed annually.
The 2008 outcome and financial plan for 2009 are shown below (Table 1). It is proposed that the recovery of costs associated with the Retail Market Design Service will be on the basis of actual costs incurred. The Manager RMDS will furnish regularly reports for CER on progress against plan.
Table 1. 2009 Financial Plan (with 2008 outcome)
| Item | Outcome 2008 | Proposed 2009 | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labour cost | 710,393 | 815,240 | |
| Accommodation | 38,160 | 47,500 | |
| IT &Telecoms | 31,376 | 38,000 | |
| Server and storage | 323,160 | 335,000 | IPT environment &storage, ARIS, website., servers. |
| Others | 2,733 | 5,000 | |
| Professional Fees | 29,764 | 100,000 | Gemserve Assurance contract |
| Total | 1,135,586 | 1,340,740 |
Main costs will be payroll, storage for IPT environment and Assurance Services
The reduction in the operating costs of the section since 2007 is result of a number of issues. Primariily there has not been market design changes implemented during this period and consequently the resourcing and costs associated with this has not transpired. It is expected that this work will normalise in 2009 and hence the budgetted rise for 2009. Likewise the budgetted core resourcing for the section hasn't reached its expected number hence the labour costs for the business has been below that budgetted for. Appropriate resourcing for RMDS is one of the key targets for 2009.
As a result of the difference between the actual and budgetted figures for 2007 and 2008 there is a disparity in what should have been included in the DUOS tariff mechanism. To correct the difference ESB Networks Asses Management will submit as part of their overall submission the As a result of the difference between the actual and budgetted figures for 2007 and 2008 there is a disparity in what should have been included in the DUOS tariff mechanism. To correct the difference ESB Networks Asses Management will submit as part of their overall submission the necessary regunds. The balancing statement below outlines the figures involved.
RMDS DUOS/Actual Balancing statement for 07 and 08.
| Item | 2007 Actual | 2008 Actual | 2009 Plan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labour cost | 875 | 710 | 815 |
| Accommodation | 42 | 38 | 48 |
| IT &Telecoms | 43 | 31 | 38 |
| Server and storage | 276 | 323 | 335 |
| Others | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Professional Fees | 128 | 30 | 100 |
| Total | 1,368 | 1,135 | 1,341 |
| DUOS Provision | -1,630 | -1,640 | 0 |
| Balance (Credit is Refund) | -262 | -505 |